I don’t know if you’ve ever seen the goofy t-shirt
that has common excuses tennis players use when they hit a bad shot.
The shirt says things like: “the sun got in my eyes,” and “my strings
were too tight.” You get the point. While the shirt is intended as a
light joke, it speaks to a natural tendency that all of us have when we
make a mistake. We immediately leap to the mitigating factors that led
us astray. Top athletes, in particular, fall prey to this defense
mechanism, often called denial,
because they have honed their games to such an extent that they feel as
though they are no longer prone to simple mistakes. This is why you so
often see a player glance with a disbelieving look at his or her
strings, racket, the ground or the air after a bad shot, trying to
fathom the reason for their miscue. But instead of excusing away a bad
shot, I encourage you to use a skill I will call ‘radical
responsibility’, in which you avoid the easy balm of environmental fluke
and instead take full, personal ownership for the mistake. Owning your
errors is the quickest path to shoring them up, whereas excusing them
away is the surest way to remain in the fiction-laden universe of
denial and sour grapes. In this post, I will expand on this common
pitfall and promote the skill of radical responsibility as a way toward
improved performance.
Often, there are some other cognitive distortions lurking behind a
defense mechanism and it’s important to know which one you might be
using when you resort to excuses. I have written about them both previously, but the first is perfectionism.
Many athletes understandably fall prey to perfectionism because they
work so hard and are always striving for the perfect result. This kind
of striving is a good thing. But it derails performance when the
athlete thinks he or she has trained away all mistakes. But even the
best players hit the ball into the net or chili-dip an easy chip shot.
An excuse, then, masks the insult that the mistake has caused to the
imagined perfection. But, often a mistake can be a good opportunity to
notice a technical flaw or to realize that your attention has strayed
from the task at hand. The second one is grandiosity,
the idea that as we train and get better, we get beyond making certain
mistakes, that somehow they are beneath us, that One so Great should
never make an error so small. They say that great mathematicians are
not good at simple calculations. But, that doesn’t make them immune to
the laws of nature which addition, subtraction and division describe.
No. The real opportunities for learning from mistakes comes from taking radical responsibility
for them. Instead of “I had a bad lie,” try, “I didn’t account for my
lie.” Instead of “the wind really took that,” try, “I didn’t adequately
judge the wind.” That is, radical responsibility demands that you
bring your own agency into focus before considering the environmental
factors. Doing so will give you more opportunities to know what you
need to work on, and will give you a greater sense of ownership in the
outcome. You take credit for your victories, so you should also put
yourself forward as the author of your mistakes.
I will leave you with two recent examples of how this sense of radical
responsibility can play itself out even among the best players. After
missing the cut at this year’s U.S. Open, 2007 Masters champion Zach
Johnson remarked, “I’d describe the whole course as manipulative. It
just enhances my disdain for the USGA and how they manipulate courses.”
Now contrast that remark with one that comes from the 1996 P.G.A.
Champion, Mark Brooks. Many people might not have known that he was
actually caddying for another tour player at this year’s Players
Championship. When asked what his years of competitive experience were
bringing to his man’s bag, he replied: “One thing I try to get him to do
is to take responsibility for his shots, really do it, deep down.
And the second thing is to work on his deficiencies.” Note that the
two are connected: take radical responsibility for your mistakes, see
them as windows to deeper technical flaws, and then use that feedback to
reduce their frequency. Radical responsibility: put it in your bag and
on your next t-shirt.(For help with this or any other performance challenge, don't hesitate to contact Altius Performance Works at MattMunichPhD@gmail.com.)